I’m in the midst of a huge round-up of iPhone golf-specific GPS (range finder) and/or scorecard apps for Macworld. As of now, I’ve identified 32 of them, but I’m wondering if I’ve missed any. If you have a second, please check out this list and let me know (via a comment here or via Twitter) if you’re aware of any other apps.

Read on for the list (note that some of these may be mis-categorized as I haven’t tested all of them yet)…
More »« Less

Greetings, my faithful handful of readers…

For an upcoming Macworld project, I need a large volume of email. To that end, I’ve set up a new account in which to build my collection. The address is:

ineedalearjet@gmail.com

Please feel free to share this address with anyone, post it on your blog, Tweet your friends about it, etc. I’m looking for a big collection; I assume most of it will be spam, but if you feel like just dropping a line and saying “hello!,” that’s fine, too! Note that I won’t be replying to any messages sent to this account.

Thanks in advance for help spreading the word!

It was my turn on the Macworld video blog-go-round again this week. The topic I chose is “working with multiple Macs in one home.” The end result is a 10-minute clip covering a number of third-party tools that make the process easier, and a couple of general usage hints.

Due to the huge number of downloads, the size of the macworld.com video is 320×240. But if you want, you can see grab the original 640×480 version right here. Warning, it’s 185MB in size (I didn’t work very hard to compress it, so the quality is good, but it’s huge).

As you might guess, I get a lot of email from readers of Macworld and macosxhints.com. For the most part, I love hearing from readers — even if it’s negative feedback, believe it or not. In the case of negative feedback, however, it’s nice if the writer provides enough detail so I know (a) what they’re upset about, and (b) what I might be able to do about it. I’ve actually had many useful and productive exchanges with folks who wrote to flame me for one reason or another.

However, on the opposite side of the fence, as an example of the kind of useless feedback I hate receiving, I offer up this email that arrived this morning:

Do you proof read these articles before you publish them?

That was the entire email. I have no idea which typos the author may be referring to, nor for that matter, which one of the 20 to 30 things I wrote last week that those typos may be in. It’s also somewhat ironic to note that proofread is one word, not two — if you’re going to chastise me for typos, it’s best not to make any of your own!

I really do enjoy hearing from and corresponding with readers. But if you’re going to take the time and effort to write to me, at least include enough information for me to understand what it is that’s gotten your attention, so that I have some context for your comments and can respond in a meaningful manner.

As you may (or may not) know, Macworld editors each take a turn in front of the video camera on a rotating cycle; my number came up again last week, and this is the result – an OS X productivity tips video (the link is to a page of info about the video). The only problem with that video is that it’s 320×240, which makes the detail somewhat tough to see, especially in some of the larger screen captures. So I’ve decided to post (with Macworld’s permission) the larger version of the video here for download:

Productivity tips video: 640×480, 8mins 50 seconds, 90.5MB

I’ll do this with my future videos, too, at least until/unless my monthly bandwidth is used up. I don’t foresee that becoming a problem, though, unless there are over 10,000 of you out there downloading this thing :).

Once again, I’ve fallen behind in posting summaries of my Macworld articles here. I’ve now rectified that, and you’ll find them all in the archives here on the proper date (i.e. the date that matches their appearance on Macworld.com). I’ve included both blog entries (rants, usually) as well as a couple of reviews and such that I’ve worked on.
More »« Less

As you’ve read by now, Apple released iPhone update 1.1.1 last week. This update adds some compelling new features, most notably the iTunes Wi-Fi Music Store, easily-accessible iPod play controls, louder speakerphone and receiver volume, and support for video out.

However, as you’ve also read by now, the update did a few other things. First, as Apple had warned, it turned unlocked iPhones into expensive paperweights, rendering them useless. (A Macworld staffer who unlocked his phone so that we could document this procedure, had this happen to his iPhones.) Second, if you had a modified iPhone that ran third-party applications, like I had, the update removed those apps. So much for my plea to Apple. Finally, if you used Ambrosia’s iToner, or any other such ringtone utility, you discovered that all your custom ringtones were also gone.

Unlike most Apple software updates, I held off on running this one until there were some field reports about exactly what happened. Once those reports started trickling in, I came to a painful but obvious conclusion: I will never install the 1.1.1 update on my iPhone.

Read my Macworld blog entry, iPhone 1.0 forever, for the rest of the story…

You may need (or want) to run Windows, or other operating systems, alongside Mac OS X, and Parallels Desktop (4 mice) is the best-known of several programs on the market for that purpose. (Full native Windows support, of course, is also available via Apple’s Boot Camp, but it requires you to reboot out of OS X and into Windows.) A new-to-the-Mac player now brings a formidable challenger to the arena, however. VMware, an expert in x86 virtualization—that is, the ability to run one or more x86 operating systems as “guests” under a “host” x86 operating system—has released Fusion 1.0, its first OS X offering. Like Parallels, Fusion allows you to run many versions of Windows and other operating systems from within OS X. And unlike Boot Camp, you don’t have to log out and restart in order to use it.

VMware Fusion supports more than 60 operating systems: Windows coverage extends from version 3.1 to betas of Windows Server 2008. If Linux is your cup of tea, you’ll find support for Red Hat, Ubuntu, SUSE, Mandrake, and more. You can also install Novell Netware, Solaris 9 or 10, FreeBSD, and MS-DOS systems. Even 64-bit releases of Windows and some families of Linux, such as Red Hat and SUSE Enterprise Linux, are supported.

Read my Macworld article, Review: VMware Fusion, for the rest of the story…

Dear Apple:

Instead, I have a new request. Just do nothing at all regarding third-party application development on the iPhone. Nothing to encourage it, and most importantly, nothing to discourage it, prevent it, shut it down, or otherwise stop it from happening. Thank you.

So why would I (fictitiously, of course) write the above letter to Apple? Is it because I no longer feel third-party applications are important to the iPhone? No, that’s not it at all. Is it because nicely-formatted Ajax Web pages really do get the job done? No, that’s not it either. So why am I no longer concerned about Apple providing an official third-party SDK? Quite simply, I’m not concerned because a number of very bright, talented, and motivated individuals have managed to actually do the job themselves, without any help from Apple.

Read my Macworld blog entry, Don’t break my third-party iPhone apps, for the rest of the story…

As probably everyone other than Bill Gates probably heard, Apple dropped the price of the iPhone by $200 yesterday. And, very shockingly to me, this somehow upset a number of those who bought iPhones back in June. Over on the Macworld forums, I’ve been involved in some interesting discussions on the matter. Basically, my position is as follows:

• Nobody was kidnapped, dragged to an Apple Store, and forced to spend $599 on an iPhone. Everyone who bought on June 29th did so freely of their own will. (Note that I’m a possible exception to that statement, as I was asked to stand in line by my employer. But since it was their money, I didn’t really mind.)
• Whenever you buy any piece of technology, it is a known fact that it will get faster, smaller, more feature laden, and cheaper in the future. Knowing this, I have always treated a technology purchase as a pure sunk cost–whatever you pay, whenever you pay it, it’s gone. If the item’s price changes in the near future, oh well. I made my decision, I have the piece of technology, and I don’t really care if it’s cheaper.
• People are claiming the “value” of their iPhone took a $200 hit yesterday. There’s only one way I see that as a true statement: if the user was planning on selling their iPhone on eBay today. However, since we’re all on two-year contracts, I don’t see that as a big market at the moment. So if you were going to keep your iPhone and continue to use it, your phone’s value is unchanged: it’s just as important to you today as it was yesterday.

So basically, I’m amazed at the number of complaints over this issue. In one of the forum threads, I asked those who felt this was an issue to explain what they would have done had Apple announced a $200 price increase instead of a drop. Would they have all rushed out to their mailbox to drop a check in the mail for Apple? Not surprisingly, it seems that wasn’t a popular suggestion. People want something for nothing, basically.

You’ve probably also read by now that Apple has decided to grant a $100 store credit to all those who bought iPhones prior to the price drop. Hopefully this will silence the criticism, but I doubt it since it leaves $100 “missing” from the pockets of those who are complaining. From my seat, though, Apple didn’t have to do this at all. When you choose to buy something, you’re basically fulfilling a contract with the product supplier: I agree to give you this much money, and you agree to give me the product. Anything that happens after that (outside of normal “price protection” windows, which are not 60+ days in length) is just something that happens.

Anyway, am I all wet in my thinking? This demand for a credit due to a price drop seems unprecedented to me; nobody complained when iPod Photos plummeted $200 a few short months after their introduction. Why is the iPhone different?